As the Federal Government of Nigeria is making frantic efforts to ensure the extradition of Mr.Simeon Ekpa to Nigeria from Finland where he’s facing charges of instigating insecurities in South East Nigeria, a group under the auspices of Igbo-Biafra Nationalists ,IBN, with Mazi Uche Mefor as founder says it would be difficult for Nigeria as a nation to win the legal battle of extraditing the freedom crusader to Nigeria......Read The Full Article>>.....Read The Full Article>>
The Spokesperson of IBN, Edoziuno Chukwunonso, recently disclosed this to newsmen while reacting on the arrest of Ekpa by Finland authority.
Just as Mefor insisted that, “the debate surrounding Simon Ekpa’s potential extradition from Finland to Nigeria continues to stir legal and political discourse, with Mazi Uche Mefor, the convenor of the Igbo-Biafra Nationalists (IBN) and the Indigenous People of Igbo Nation for Self-determination (IPINS), issuing a strong statement on the matter. Nigerian authorities will face significant challenges in their bid to extradite Ekpa, a Finnish citizen, back to Nigeria.
“Simon Ekpa cannot be extradited to Nigeria by Nigerian authorities merely by wishing for it or expressing it,” Mefor stated.
He highlighted that such an attempt would result in a “protracted legal battle” in which Nigeria is unlikely to prevail, citing Ekpa’s Finnish citizenship and the stringent human rights protocols in Finland.
Mefor pointed out that Finland, known for its strong stance on human rights, would not simply hand over Ekpa to Nigerian authorities without guarantees.
“Nigeria has appalling and horrible human rights records,” he said, while also emphasizing that the Finnish authorities would need Nigeria to sign an agreement ensuring that Ekpa would not be subjected to torture or inhumane treatment, informing that without such guarantees, extradition appears unlikely.
“If that ever comes to trial and imprisonment, he will serve his time in Finland, not in Nigeria,” Mefor added, underscoring Finland’s legal protections for its citizens, especially in cases involving countries with questionable human rights practices.
On the Biafra’s Cause, he said: “Despite the legal complexities, Mefor noted a potential positive outcome for the Biafran cause. “The issue of Nigeria and Biafra will be raised and discussed,” he said. This would bring attention to the longstanding calls for self-determination in the South-East region. However, Mefor was critical of Ekpa’s actions, accusing him of criminalizing the Biafran movement. “Simon and his gang, under the inspiration of Nnamdi Kanu, have slaughtered innocent Igbo-Biafran sons and daughters in cold blood and during peacetime,” Mefor stated. These actions, he argued, have cast a shadow over the Biafran struggle. Nonetheless, Mefor remained confident that the larger cause for Biafran independence would not be derailed by Ekpa’s faction or his arrest.”
While commenting on the potential impact of Ekpa’s arrest on Nigeria, “I believe the immediate benefit for Nigeria would be to demoralize Ekpa’s “criminal gang” and to weaken their operations by investigating their financial sources. However, he suggested that such efforts would not address the deeper issues fueling the Biafran movements.”
In his concluding remarks, Mefor asserted that “nobody can ultimately stop the issue or idea of Biafra.” While the methods of pursuing self-rule might evolve, the central demand for justice and independence remains intact. “The idea of self-rule, which Biafra embodies, can never die in the midst of ongoing injustices against the South-East region and the Igbo-Biafrans.”
